Monday, January 20, 2020

SHAPIRO: Will Democrats Accept The Results Of The 2020 Elections?

Now in the run-up to 2020, Democrats are already suggesting that if President Trump wins, the election will have been illegitimate. This time, they’re pointing to Trump’s supposed attempt to gather information from the Ukrainian government on potential 2020 rival Joe Biden in return for release of much-needed military aid. In fact, Democrats state that if Trump is not impeached, the 2020 results will inevitably be deemed improper.

Source

Friday, January 17, 2020

Pennsylvania’s presidential election could be too close to call for days because of a new law

While the unofficial and more immediately available results have accounted for the vast majority of votes cast in years past, a new law means a significant share of ballots might not be tallied until after Election Day, according to county elections officials. Races with razor-thin margins may be too close to call for days.

Source:

Tuesday, January 14, 2020

Surge by Sanders Could Destroy Trillions in Equity

“If Bernie Sanders becomes president, I think stock prices should be 30% to 40% lower than they are now,” Stanley Druckenmiller told CNBC last year. Forbes says Druckenmiller has about $4.7 billion accumulated through a lifetime of managing money. It’s worth paying attention to his warning.

Source

Monday, January 13, 2020

Democrats Get Passes From the Media

When Elizabeth Warren applied for a post at Harvard University’s Law School years ago, she claimed minority status as an American Indian. Whether that claim had any part in acquiring that position she sought is unknown. But, soon afterward, Harvard did confirm that it had one Native American teaching law. 

Source

Thursday, January 09, 2020

CNN Settles with Covington High Schoolboy

The media smeared Catholic schoolboys as “racists” at the March for Life a year ago, in a confrontation with political activist Nathan Phillips that got intense coverage. The media were overwhelmingly biased against the students, especially Nick Sandmann, whose “smirk” and MAGA hat enraged leftists.

Source

Monday, January 06, 2020

New Cambridge Analytica Documents Reveal 'Global Network' Of Voter Manipulation

Tens of thousands of documents from the infamous and now inoperative data firm Cambridge Analytica (CA) reveal the shocking global reach of voter manipulation, reported the Guardian on Saturday.
Over 100,000 documents related to 68 countries will be revealed over the coming year, unveiling a worldwide network used to influence voter decisions on “an industrial scale”.

Source

Saturday, January 04, 2020

Bye Bye AOC? Democrat Socialist Ocasio-Cortez Could Lose House Seat After New Census

Based on the latest census projections, New York State may lose one congressional district, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fears the district that goes away will be hers.

Source

Friday, January 03, 2020

In An Attempt To Give Barack Obama A 'De Facto' 3rd Term & Ensure Radical Leftist Tyrants Run The World, The Globalists May Be About To Unveil Their 'Secret Weapon For 2020'


The whole notion of individualism, free will, and even the tolerance for other lifestyles and points of view that liberals used to extol is void in this “dog whistle” of a statement. Note: The only reason Leftists introduced the idea of dog whistles is because they are the ones who actually use them. Dog whistles are yet another tool to push collectivist thinking.
Source

Thursday, January 02, 2020

Mike Bloomberg's Secretive Election Tech Firm Lied About DNC Relationship To Lure New Recruits

A secretive digital marketing firm founded by Mike Bloomberg to help him win he 2020 election lured new recruits by falsely claiming that it would be the "primary platform" for the Democratic National Committee, according to CNBC.

Source

Wednesday, January 01, 2020

Elizabeth Warren Has A Bad Plan For Everything

Wealth tax: Tax net worth over $50 million at 2% a year, and 6% above $1 billion. To prevent the rich from yachting off, add a 40% “exit tax” on assets over $50 million upon renouncing U.S. citizenship. Estimated revenue: $3.75 trillion over a decade from 75,000 households. Most economists, including many Democrats, call that number a fantasy. Courts might also find the tax unconstitutional.

Source

Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Black Democrats energized to vote Trump out: poll

Black Democratic voters are energized to vote President Trump out of office in 2020, as less than a quarter of African Americans say their financial situation has improved over the past two years, according to a new study.

Source

Monday, December 30, 2019

How the Democrats Will Try to Beat Trump at Ballot Box

One thing dementia addled Nancy Pelosi, little Jerry Nadler and insane Schiff have made crystal clear: This is all about keeping Trump from winning the election next November; their own words damn them. They don't care about the victims of the Russia witch hunt from Carter Page, Gen. Flynn and all the others innocents sucked into their evil, diabolical game. Forcing some into bankruptcy and ruining reputations.

Source

Thursday, December 12, 2019

IG Horowitz: Report Does Not 'Vindicate Anyone,' Evidence Was Altered

"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,” the Mueller report infamously stated.

That one line served as fodder for the left to say that while Mueller's report didn't find evidence of Russian collusion, Trump's claim of "complete and total exoneration" was erroneous.

Let's compare that line to what Inspector General Michael Horowitz said on Wednesday about his report that allegedly found "no evidence of bias" by the FBI in their investigation of Trump's campaign. Horowitz said, “The activities we found here don’t vindicate anyone who touched this.”

Well, I'll be... sounds an awful lot like what the Mueller report said of Trump, doesn't it? Meanwhile, if you were paying attention to Horowitz's testimony, you probably noticed that Horowitz acknowledged that the FBI continued to spy on Carter Page, even after being informed he was actually a CIA informant. They also went back to the FISA court repeatedly after having this knowledge to have their investigation reauthorized, and withheld information, effectively lying to the court.

Oh yeah, and an FBI lawyer literally altered a document with fraudulent information in order to justify the FISA court to renew the investigation.


Read the entire article

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

IG Report Shows Comey Lied To Congress About FBI Investigation Of Trump Campaign

Soon after Monday’s release of the 476-page inspector general’s report on the Carter Page FISA applications and aspects of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation, former FBI Director James Comey took to Twitter to promote his op-ed in the Washington Post.

“So it was all lies. No treason. No spying on the campaign. No tapping Trumps [sic] wires. It was just good people trying to protect America,” Comey tweeted, with a link to his opinion article that demanded “those who attacked the FBI for two years should admit they were wrong.”

Comey’s spin is laughable. And there will be time in the days and weeks ahead to highlight the many failures of the DOJ and FBI revealed in the minutia of IG Michael Horowitz’s report. For now, though, let’s focus on a different detail exposed by Horowitz’s investigation into Crossfire Hurricane—that Comey falsely testified that the FBI had not launched an investigation into the Trump campaign.

Comey made that claim just more than a year ago, when he testified before the House Judiciary and Government Reform and Oversight committees. During that December 2018 hearing, Rep. Trey Gowdy posed this question to Comey: “Late July of 2016, the FBI did, in fact, open a counterintelligence investigation into, is it fair to say the Trump campaign or Donald Trump himself?”

“It’s not fair to say either of those things, in my recollection,” Comey retorted. “We opened investigations on four Americans to see if there was any connection between those four Americans and the Russian interference efforts. And those four Americans did not include the candidate.”

Read the entire article

Friday, December 06, 2019

At UN “Climate” Summit, Pelosi and Democrats Ignore Reality

During a congressional trip to the United Nations 25th Conference of the Parties (COP25) on “climate change,” Democrats led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.; shown) ignored reality and claimed the United States was still committed to the “climate” fight and the UN “Paris Agreement.” “We came here to say we’re still in,” Pelosi said at the UN summit in Madrid. However, in the real world, President Donald Trump, who ridiculed the man-made warming alarmism as a “hoax” to benefit Communist China, is still the president. And under his administration, the U.S. government is still in the process of leaving the controversial and illegitimate UN deal.

Beyond ignoring the fact that a skeptic of the hypothesis is still sitting in the White House, Pelosi also misled UN COP 25 attendees about Congress, too. “Our delegation is here to send a message that Congress’s commitment to take action on the climate crisis is iron-clad,” Pelosi claimed. In reality, just a tiny handful of fringe Republicans — dubbed Republicans in Name Only by political analysts — publicly support “action” on “climate.” In fact, it was major news a few weeks ago when one freshman Republican senator joined with a Democrat to create a “Climate Solutions Caucus.” Despite the effort to mislead the world, though, delegates at the UN summit are well aware of the lack of American support.

During a 30-minute press conference in Madrid, Democrats chose not to focus on Trump or the fact that Americans elected a president who boldly rejected and ridiculed the hypothesis underpinning their agenda. Instead, the coalition of radical U.S. lawmakers spent much of their time emphasizing the fact that some of America's most leftist city and state governments were handicapping their own economies and raising the cost of living for the people they represent under the guise of fighting “climate change.” Overall, they sounded detached from reality, observers said. At the end of the press conference, some of the Democrats even shouted: “We’re still in!”

Critics ridiculed the House Speaker and her fellow Democrats in the delegation for sounding so out of touch with the real world. “Pelosi and the rest need a lesson in the U.S. Constitution and how foreign policy is lawfully made in this country,” said Craig Rucker, president of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a free-market environmentalist group. After that, the CFACT chief volunteered to teach the Democrats a basic civics lesson.

Read the entire article

Tuesday, December 03, 2019

Hitler’s War Crimes vs. Those of Churchill & the Americans

When we want to demonize someone the worst epithet we can think of is to call him a Nazi or compare the person to Hitler, as Hillary Clinton did when she declared Russia’s President Putin “the new Hitler.” This ingrained habit comes from the influence of the massive anti-German World War II propaganda. Revisionist historians who have actually dug up the buried evidence and examined it have made a case that whatever the Nazi crimes, they were rivaled, if not exceeded, by those of Churchill and the Americans.

Unz, a prolific reader with a knack for tying things together reviews some of the true history in what follows. To condition yourself for the coming shock, keep in mind that the same Hitler that is said to have hated Jews and systematically gassed and burnt them, had 150,000 half-and quarter-Jews serving in his armies, “mostly as combat officers, and these included at least 15 half-Jewish generals and admirals, with another dozen quarter Jews holding those same high ranks. The most notable example was Field Marshal Erhard Milch, Hermann Goering’s powerful second-in-command, who played such an important operational role in creating the Luftwaffe. Milch certainly had a Jewish father, and according to some much less substantiated claims, perhaps even a Jewish mother as well, while his sister was married to an SS general.”

When truth-tellers rattle our cages, we get upset over having our comfortable make-believe world disturbed and shout invectives. Rather than condemn the messanger, the more mature response would be to condemn those who lied to us and institutionalized false history into our consciousness. Keep in mind that the few who tell you the truth pay a high price for doing so; therefore, you should refrain from adding your invective to the copious amount heaped on them by the Establishment. Think about it. Which is your true friend, the one who tells you the truth, or the one who controls the explanations you receive in order to advance his own agenda?

I again state my admiration of Ron Unz. He is Jewish. He is highly intelligent. He is a Harvard graduate. He is an entrepreneur who made himself a multi-millionaire. He could have held his fire and risen to the top of the establishment. Instead, he chose to tell us the truth. Ron Unz is the person who should be President. Unlike Trump, Unz would know how to staff a government that would put truth and morality back in charge of our future.

Read the entire article

Friday, November 29, 2019

Non-Intervention: An Imperfect Solution to a Terrible Problem

On November 27, US president Donald Trump signed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act.

The bill, passed by veto-proof majorities in Congress amid large protests in the “special administrative region,” allows the president to impose sanctions on officials who violate human rights there, and requires various US government departments to annually review Hong Kong’s political status with a view toward changing trade relations if the US doesn’t like what it sees.

In response to the bill’s passage and Trump’s signature, the Chinese government in Beijing denounced US “meddling” in China’s “internal affairs” and threatened “countermeasures.”

Some non-interventionists agree with Beijing’s line on the matter, claiming that Hong Kong is intrinsically part of a thing called “China” and that the US simply has no business poking its nose into the conflict between pro-democracy (and increasingly pro-independence) protesters and mainland China’s Communist Party regime.

I happen to disagree with Beijing’s line, but that doesn’t mean I think the bill is a good idea. Non-interventionism is sound foreign policy not because the situation in Hong Kong is simple, but because it’s complex.

Read the entire article